What is the Difference Between Smile Pro and Silk Eye Surgery?

SMILE Pro and Silk Eye Surgery are revolutionary techniques in vision correction, offering patients new avenues to enhance their visual acuity. Although they share a common goal, these methods differ significantly regarding surgical procedures, recovery time, and patient suitability. In this section, we will delve deeper into the unique characteristics of each technique, focusing on these key differences to help potential patients make informed decisions. From the cutting-edge laser technology in SMILE Pro to the minimally invasive approach of Silk Eye Surgery, we aim to compare these two innovative solutions in vision correction comprehensively.

SMILE Pro and Silk Surgery are two refractive procedures for correcting vision problems.


SMILE Pro is a laser-based surgery that cuts the cornea’s middle part to remove tissue and change its shape.SMILE (Small Incision Lenticule Extraction) Pro is a minimally invasive procedure. It uses a femtosecond laser to create a lenticule (a small lens-shaped piece of tissue) within the cornea, which is then removed through a small incision. 

On the other hand, Silk Surgery uses a microkeratome or femtosecond laser to create a thin flap in the cornea, which is then lifted to expose the underlying corneal tissue. A laser is then used to reshape the cornea. Silk Eye Surgery is a complex microsurgery that uses sutures to mend torn or damaged corneas.

Effective conditions:

The two surgical procedures, SMILE Pro and Silk Eye Surgery cater to differing eye health issues. SMILE Pro is typically beneficial for individuals grappling with myopia or nearsightedness. However, it is usually not the best option for those suffering from hypermetropia (farsightedness) or astigmatism. Silk Eye Surgery is often the treatment of choice for more severe ocular conditions such as corneal dystrophies, keratoconus, and significant corneal scarring. Therefore, the choice of procedure heavily depends on the specific eye condition of the patient.

Healing Time:

The time it takes for a patient to recover differs significantly between the two procedures. Those who undergo SMILE Pro typically enjoy a swift recovery, often attaining clear vision mere days post-procedure. In contrast, Silk Eye Surgery, being a more intricate process, requires a more extended recovery timeframe, spanning several weeks and sometimes extending to months.


As with any surgical procedure, SMILE Pro and Silk Eye Surgery carry their risk factors. SMILE Pro, being minimally invasive, generally has fewer risks. Some possible complications may include transient dry eye or night vision disturbances. Silk Eye Surgery, a more intricate and invasive procedure, carries potential risks such as infection, corneal haze, or even loss of vision if complications arise. Both procedures have potential side effects, such as dry eyes, halos, and glare, but they are usually temporary and resolve within a few weeks. SMILE Pro may have some advantages over SILK regarding corneal integrity and safety.


Both SMILE Pro and Silk Eye Surgery involve different cost structures. The exact price for each procedure can fluctuate greatly based on various factors, such as the surgery’s location, the surgeon’s expertise, and the patient’s specific condition. Generally, Silk Eye Surgery is a more intricate procedure and thus incurs a lower cost than SMILE Pro. However, it is essential to remember that the long-term benefits of these procedures can ultimately save money on future vision correction needs. 

Enduring effects: 

Both SMILE Pro and Silk Eye Surgery are known to provide long-lasting vision correction. However, in some cases, the results of Silk Eye Surgery may diminish over time due to factors such as age-related changes or the natural progression of underlying eye conditions. SMILE Pro, on the other hand, is relatively new and has shown promising long-term.

Carry through:

Both SMILE Pro and Silk Eye Surgery necessitate post-operative care, although the complexity of Silk Eye Surgery often requires more in-depth attention post-surgery. In contrast, patients who choose SMILE Pro typically need fewer follow-up appointments. It is important to note that irrespective of the procedure chosen, post-operative care is vital to ensure a successful recovery and optimal results.

Success Rate: 

SMILE Pro and Silk Eye Surgery are known to have high success rates, treating different eye conditions. SMILE Pro, typically recommended for myopia, boasts a high success rate, with over 95% of patients achieving 20/40 vision or better, which is the legal requirement for driving without glasses in most regions. SMILE Pro Eye Surgery has an excellent track record, particularly for treating more severe conditions such as corneal dystrophies and keratoconus. However, success largely depends on various factors, including the patient’s overall health, the severity of their condition, and the skill and experience of the surgeon.

What makes SMILE Pro more preferred?

SMILE Pro eye surgery has several advantages, making it a preferred choice for many patients and surgeons. The minimally invasive procedure significantly reduces the risk of complications such as infection or corneal haze that might occur in more complex surgeries. The recovery period is typically shorter, with most patients reporting clear vision within a few days. This quick recovery time means lesser impact on the patient’s daily activities, fostering a smooth transition back to their routine. Furthermore, SMILE Pro is typically less expensive than other intricate procedures like Silk Eye Surgery, making it a more cost-effective option while offering comparable, if not superior, vision correction results. While SMILE Pro might not be suitable for all eye conditions, myopic patients seeking a safer, faster, and more affordable solution to their vision problems emerge as the superior choice. SMILE Pro is indeed approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). As the FDA approves, SMILE Pro is cleared to correct myopia or nearsightedness. This validates the safety and effectiveness of the procedure, and it has since helped many patients achieve better visual acuity without the need for glasses or contact lenses.


To Top

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This