There was a time when Kubernetes did not exist and didn’t have much support in the early phases of the technology. Still, organizations managed to optimize their production stream and developer productivity through various use cases. In the old days, you had to deploy docker runtime through the existing production server and then update the deployment runtime.
Small development teams are more productive when they adopt containers in a short timeframe. Essentially, containers complement Kubernetes, but Kubernetes don’t need containers. When it comes to container adoption, you have to follow systematic and sequential steps.
Kubernetes Vs. Containers: Workflow and Collaboration
Docker containers ensure developer collaboration and workflow process. It would be fair to state that containers are beneficial for an organization’s software development processes. Apart from continuous delivery, containers can also minimize hands-off friction and boost production.
For starters, operations and infrastructure teams make it possible for developers to roll out their containers. Still, Kubernetes consulting serves as an ideal starting point for companies. A third party consultant can help any business move into the technology.
What about Static Environments and Team Development
You can use container images straight from the CI server to the production runtime. Companies can also reduce configuration issues throughout the environments and improve troubleshooting issues. However, consistent team development and maintenance of static environments require a lot of investment. But if you want to improve your release velocity for operations and development teams, docker containers couldn’t be more ideal.
Continuous Delivery, Dynamic Environments, and Automation
When automation comes into the picture, operators have to improve the overall service quality of applications. At this point, you have to embrace infrastructure-as-code, immutable infrastructure, continuous delivery, and deployment automation.
Of course, you will have to upskill your employees and collaborate with vendors to get the hang of Kubernetes. Most companies avail the services of a vendor or partner to get assistance and make a successful transition.
In hindsight, Kubernetes should be able to increase operational capabilities to deploy services and applications. It can include automated deployment, high local access, automated configuration, accurate service scalability, and scalable policy management.
Kubernetes Dilemma
You may have some reservations about Kubernetes, but it is an evolving ecosystem that can drive more innovation and help you speed up your essential business operations. Although Kubernetes is associated with more errors, inconsistency, and overlaps, its ecosystem continues to help companies drive more innovation and growth.
Typically, Kubernetes cater to production automation and require high availability, scaling options, elasticity, and multi-tenancy. Yes, Kubernetes can make it difficult to manage production and non-production environments.
When it comes to Kubernetes support and adoption, the trick is to update tools of existing environments. It is the main reason companies focus on a combination of tools to improve the usability and functionality of Kubernetes.
Bottom Line
Companies have to consider whether or not the investment is beneficial in the long run and then decide to move forward. After all, container adoption takes a lot of time and effort.
But whether it’s Kubernetes or containers adoption, the first course of action for your company should be to improve key metrics and solve pain points. In retrospect, you have to figure out how Kubernetes or containers solution ties together with your business operations and may impact future outcomes.
