Tech News

Attribution Models For Mobile Apps: Everything You Need To Know

Mobile attribution is the process of determining which source of traffic led to the installation of an app. In other words, marketers need to know which medium brought in the client who clicked the call-to-action button. Mobile attribution company helps you track a viable answer to this issue. Advertisers may see how people react to different creatives in real-time and gain insights into the places where their advertisements perform best. Users’ paths through the sales pipeline can be tracked as well. 

Since 90% of all internet users now use their phones to go online, mobile ads are a great bet. However, without proper attribution, your advertising budget can be squandered on mobile app downloads. 

Various Attribution Models for Mobile Applications 

By incorporating a number of options, app tracking attribution enables marketers to draw more accurate customer journey maps and gain actionable data and insights that can be used to boost conversion rates and ROI.

The specifics of mobile attribution models have an effect on measurable data in some way. This variation appears to be caused by the wide variety of goals that different advertisers pursue with each individual advertising effort.

First click attribution

When a potential customer’s initial interaction with your brand is captured by this method, you know you’ve hit the jackpot. Advertisements on social media sites like Facebook typically link directly to a business’s website. 

For a marketer, knowing that a customer arrived at the online shop as a result of viewing and clicking on an ad is a huge coup. Everything else in the advertising industry works the same way. This means that app tracking attribution is a powerful tool for helping marketers trace the origins of their app’s user base.

  • Pros – With this method, businesses may easily build a reliable source of demand for their products by determining which of their initial touchpoints actually result in sales.
  • Cons – Marketers won’t be able to gauge the significance of subsequent touchpoints because it doesn’t account for them.

Last click attribution

This attribution can be used by advertisers to see which ads were most relevant to consumers before they took action (such as installing an app or buying a product). The main concern is that customers could make a purchase decision apart from the links provided in the email newsletters sent out by marketers. Clicking on an AdWords ad at a later time will still attribute the conversion to AdWords and not the email campaign.

  • Pros – When your advertising campaign’s overarching goal is to increase sales or app downloads, a conversion monitoring approach such as this one is an excellent choice. In addition, there is no requirement for complicated mathematics or technical training to operate it.
  • Cons – Unlike the first point of contact, however, marketers here aren’t equipped with the knowledge necessary to nurture customers into long-term relationships. The entire marketing strategy, from email campaigns and content plans to retargeting strategies, is being kept secret for the time being.

Multi-touch attribution

A customer’s full experience is portrayed, with each stage receiving its due recognition. To rephrase, all the steps a user takes from seeing an ad on Twitter to visiting the advertiser’s website to liking the firm on Facebook to finally purchasing an app will be recorded.

  • Pros – Multi-touch attribution is an effective data-driven and app-tracking solution due to the transparency it provides in all marketing channels.
  • Cons – Getting it out there requires a marketer with a deep well of experience, which is no easy feat. Furthermore, numerous intricate calculations are needed.

Time-decay attribution

The same touchpoints as in linear attribution are a part of this method, but the credit is distributed in a different way. Therefore, a higher credit rate signals being closer to the point of conversion.

  • Pros – All touchpoints are included, but the most recent ones—which often play a crucial role in decision-making—are given special attention. So, marketers can observe the customer’s progress toward a purchase in real-time and tailor their efforts accordingly.
  • Cons – While the bottom of a funnel may be less important in some campaigns than the top and middle, they hold much greater importance in others. Therefore, this tactic works best for a select few campaigns.

View-through attribution

Using this attribution method, you can track down site users who saw an advertisement but did not react to it. This attribution is useful for monitoring long-term actions, such as when a user starts the installation process but abandons it before it’s finished.

  • Pros – This approach, which is typically based on clicks, provides more data points. A non-clicked impression that still leads to a sale may be counted by the advertiser.
  • Cons – The number of conversions can only increase so fast. One example is how Google’s view-through converts only work for a month.

Selecting A Web Attribution Model

Marketers today have a wide variety of options when it comes to mobile app attribution models and must choose one to implement. Three questions must be answered before a marketer can make a wise choice: Exactly what are the aims of the advertising campaign? In what capacity do you operate your business? What does a conversion’s lifespan look like?

To Top

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This