Cloud mining was once hailed as a democratising innovation: a way for individuals to participate in cryptocurrency mining without owning expensive hardware. Yet, alongside legitimate services, an industry of unregulated cloud mining schemes has proliferated, enticing investors with promises of fixed daily returns, guaranteed profits, and risk-free passive income.
Global regulators, including the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), have repeatedly warned: such offers are not only misleading but often outright fraudulent.
This investigative feature examines the rise of these schemes, the regulatory response, real-world enforcement cases, and what the future may hold for both investors and legitimate businesses.
What Cloud Mining Is, and Isn’t
At its core, cloud mining allows users to lease computing power from remote data centres to mine Proof-of-Work cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. A legitimate operator covers energy, hardware, and maintenance costs while distributing mining rewards proportionally.
But in unregulated corners of the market, many schemes:
- Promise guaranteed fixed returns, regardless of Bitcoin’s price or mining difficulty.
- Fail to disclose whether they own any mining hardware at all.
- Require upfront payments with limited withdrawal options.
- Encourage investors to recruit others in pyramid-style reward structures.
Such models bear the hallmarks of Ponzi schemes, where early investors are paid with funds from new entrants rather than genuine mining output.
The FCA’s Position: High Risk, No Protection
The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has issued a series of stark warnings about crypto investment and cloud mining.
- High risk of total loss: The FCA reminds consumers that investing in crypto is “high risk” and they should be prepared to lose all invested money (FCA guidance).
- Unauthorised operators: Many cloud mining firms are not FCA-authorised. If things go wrong, investors cannot turn to the Financial Ombudsman Service or claim compensation under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
- Misleading promotions: Claims of guaranteed daily payouts, “low-risk profits,” or “safe income” are almost always misleading.
- Companies House vs FCA Approval: Investors should be aware that many schemes highlight their UK Companies House registration as “evidence” of compliance. This is misleading. Registering a company in the UK simply means it exists as a legal entity, it does not mean the firm is authorised to manage client money or investments. To operate such a business legally, a firm must be authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). Without FCA authorisation, investors have no protection from the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) or the Financial Ombudsman Service.
- Clone firms: Scammers frequently impersonate legitimate businesses. The FCA has noted it “cannot at this time distinguish between legitimate and scam sites” in many cases.
What Do You Do When You Have Hundreds of Clone Sites Like These? How Do You Know Which Platform Is Real And Which Is Fake?
| CredMiner | OurCryptoMiner | APTMining | SimMining |
| HMining | FleetMining | MintMiner |
XiushanMining
|
| GrowingAuto | BJMining | OptoMiner | QuidMiner |
| HashBeat | All4Mining | FyEnergy | SWLMiner |
| MomHash | BTCMiningPool | GoldenMining | Tallive |
In September 2023, the FCA placed Cloud Mining City on its warning list, stating explicitly that the company was unauthorised and urging consumers to avoid it.
The numbers underline the scale: in 2024 alone, the FCA logged over 10,000 fake FCA scam reports, with nearly 1,000 victims handing over money. By mid-2025, a further 5,000 reports had already been filed.
The SEC’s View: When Cloud Mining Becomes a Security
In March 2025, the US SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance clarified that solo and pooled Proof-of-Work mining do not automatically fall under securities laws.
However, the regulator stressed:
- When cloud mining contracts involve an investment of money, in a common enterprise, with an expectation of profit derived from others’ efforts, the Howey Test applies.
- In such cases, offerings may be treated as securities and require registration, disclosures, and compliance with anti-fraud provisions.
- Promising guaranteed returns is a major red flag and a common feature in enforcement cases.
Enforcement Actions
- Mining Capital Coin (MCC): In August 2025, the SEC secured a $46 million default judgment against MCC and its founders, finding they had misled investors about mining operations.
- GAW Miners / ZenMiner: In 2015, the SEC exposed that investors were sold “shares” in non-existent mining capacity, operating effectively as a Ponzi scheme.
- HyperFund: The SEC charged founders of the $1.7B HyperFund scheme for falsely claiming crypto mining generated its high returns.
US state regulators, through NASAA, have likewise warned Congress not to weaken state powers to combat such fraud.
Red Flags: How to Spot a Cloud Mining Scam
Regulators consistently highlight these warning signs:
- Guaranteed daily or weekly returns, mining profits are inherently volatile.
- Unregistered firms or false licensing claims, many rely on their Companies House registration to appear “legitimate,” but this is not the same as FCA authorisation. Only FCA-authorised firms can legally manage investor funds.
- No proof of actual mining operations, lack of hardware details, location, or energy costs.
- Upfront payments and withdrawal issues, classic Ponzi hallmarks.
- Heavy reliance on referrals or MLM structures, often a pyramid scheme.
- “Low-risk” or “no-risk” language, fundamentally misleading.
The Scale of Losses
- In the UK, crypto fraud losses surged to £306 million in 2022–2023, up from £216 million the year prior.
- Global figures are harder to pin down, but enforcement cases suggest billions lost to fraudulent cloud mining schemes since 2015.
- Action Fraud in the UK notes that many reports involve adverts on social media, a key channel for promoting misleading mining offers.
The Future of Cloud Mining (2025–2030)
- Regulatory tightening: Expect stricter enforcement and licensing requirements for any investment-style cloud mining contracts.
- Transparency as a survival tool: Legitimate providers must offer verifiable proof of mining operations, energy sourcing, and audited financials.
- Market consolidation: Only a handful of regulated, transparent players may survive.
- Environmental pressures: As mining energy costs rise and climate policies tighten, cloud mining margins will shrink further.
- Consumer awareness: Education campaigns from regulators and media (like TechBullion) will make investors more cautious.
Why TechBullion Is Not Accepting Unregulated Cloud Mining Promotions
The TechBullion terms of publishing prohibits misleading content. Promoting unregulated cloud mining schemes, especially those offering guaranteed returns, risks:
- Violating Google Ads / Google Play policies on financial misrepresentation.
- Breaching regulatory guidance from the FCA and SEC.
- Misleading readers and damaging trust.
TechBullion’s editorial policy not to accept such content aligns with both best practices and consumer protection principles.
Conclusion
Cloud mining is not inherently fraudulent, but when it comes packaged with guaranteed high fixed returns, it almost always is. Regulators on both sides of the Atlantic have made their stance clear: these promises are unrealistic, risky, and often unlawful.
Investors should perform rigorous due diligence, check the FCA Register and SEC filings, and remain sceptical of “too-good-to-be-true” offers. Most importantly: a Companies House registration does not equal FCA approval. To run a business managing investor funds in the UK, an FCA licence is essential. Without it, consumers are unprotected.
For media and platforms, refusing to promote such schemes is both an ethical duty and a regulatory safeguard.
